Facts About case law on status quo on transfer of legal shares Revealed
Facts About case law on status quo on transfer of legal shares Revealed
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
Official database for searching and viewing federal court dockets and case documents. Modest fees utilize.
Today tutorial writers tend to be cited in legal argument and decisions as persuasive authority; frequently, They are really cited when judges are attempting to employ reasoning that other courts have not however adopted, or when the judge thinks the academic's restatement of your legislation is more powerful than could be found in case regulation. Consequently common legislation systems are adopting one of the strategies prolonged-held in civil law jurisdictions.
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could possibly be consulted in deciding a current case. It may be used to guide the court, but is not really binding precedent.
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Plainly distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion involves a transfer to your higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, on the other hand, offers financial relief by inserting an employee in a higher spend scale, without shifting their position duties or position. It's a mechanism designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained while in the same fork out scale for a lengthy time, particularly when they lack possibilities for promotion. Upgradation is actually a policy Resource used to ease the hardship of extended-term stagnation. Read more
145 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based about the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
116 . Cr.Misc. 787/2024 (S.B.) Muhammad Anwar V/S S.P Complaint Mobile Hyderabad & Others Sindh High Court, Circuit at Hyderabad 2025 SHC HYD 12 Justice from the Peace u/s 22-A isn't obliged to afford a chance of hearing towards the accused party; nor obliged to always or mechanically issue directions for registration of FIR; but is required to consider all relevant factors, with care and caution; to avoid machinery of criminal law from being misused; frivolous complaints must be discouraged; relationship, enmity, transactions, litigation and other remedies, are many of the relevant factors. Read more
S. Supreme Court. Generally speaking, proper case citation consists of the names from the parties to the initial case, the court in which the case was listened to, the date it was decided, and also the book in which it is recorded. Different citation requirements may contain italicized or underlined text, and certain specific abbreviations.
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a properly-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is topic towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.
Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other satisfactory remedy is provided by law." It really is well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated higher than. However no harassment shall be caused to possibly party as well as the case shall be decided by the competent court of regulation if pending. Read more
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to some tradition that the reader should be able to deduce the logic from the decision plus the statutes.[four]
eight. For your reasons stated over, this court finds the petition for being without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend inside the comments, and their request is As a result acceded to. All pending applications, if any, also are dismissed. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It's also a effectively-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority check here entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.